Skip to main content
AACR Project GENIE v19.0 · 21,017 myeloid patients Panel-adjusted Fisher's exact with Benjamini-Hochberg FDR N=1 case study · Not clinical guidance

Prognosis

Risk stratification vs actual outcome, 28+ months post-HSCT

IPSS-M Score Very High
2.976
Very High (threshold >1.5), Bernard et al. NEJM Evid 2022
ELN 2022
Adverse
Monosomy 7 overrides IDH2
Median OS
9.7 months
ELN Adverse, newly diagnosed
Actual OS Alive
28+ months
MRD negative, full chimerism
Drivers Unprecedented
5
On 5 convergence axes + monosomy 7

Expected vs Actual

Source: Median OS values from published cohort studies. Actual survival as of March 2026.

Risk Model Comparison

ModelCategoryMedian OSSource
IPSS-MVery High (2.976)1.0 yearBernard et al. NEJM Evid 2022
ELN 2022Adverse9.7 monthsLachowiez et al. Blood Adv 2023
Chr7-aberrant + PTPN11HR 2.24N/AHalik et al. J Hematol Oncol 2024
Chr7-aberrant + IDH2HR 0.51 (protective)N/AHalik et al. 2024
VenAza (RAS pathway)Lower-benefit5.5 monthsDöhner et al. Blood 2024
R/R AML + PTPN11Adverse4.6 monthsShahswar et al. Leukemia 2025
Note: HR = hazard ratio. IPSS-M 13
[13] E 2022
Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes. NEJM Evid (2022)
trained on 2,957 MDS patients. ELN 2022 14
[14] H 2022
Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 ELN recommendations. Blood (2022)
risk stratification. AML genomic classification per Papaemmanuil et al. 12
[12] E 2016
Genomic Classification and Prognosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. N Engl J Med (2016)
.

Outside the Model

Every scoring system places this profile in its worst category. But the scoring systems are built on population data. This mutation profile does not exist in the population. The patient scores not just worst: the patient is outside the system's ability to score.

IPSS-M 13
[13] E 2022
Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes. NEJM Evid (2022)
was trained on 2,957 patients. None had this quadruple combination. The model extrapolates from patients who are less complex and assumes the pattern continues linearly. It likely does not.

And the patient is alive. MRD-negative. Full donor chimerism. 28 months post-HSCT. With multi-organ GvHD that went untreated for 26 months. That is also outside the model.

This is a data point worth studying: the most adverse profile documented in 31,000+ patients has survived 28+ months post-HSCT.

With EZH2 V662A now confirmed as a fifth driver mutation 10
[10] A 2020
Mutational mechanisms of EZH2 inactivation in myeloid neoplasms. Leukemia (2020)
, a novel variant never described in literature, carrying 0/20,739 carriers in GENIE. The profile moves from unprecedented to genuinely unknown. The quintuple expected frequency is ~7.7×10-13, or approximately 1 in 1.3 trillion. No prognostic model was designed to handle this.

EZH2-mutant MDS with chromosome 7 abnormalities carries the worst survival among EZH2-mutant subgroups 11
[11] S 2023
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of EZH2-mutant myelodysplastic syndrome. Leuk Res (2023)
. SETBP1 + monosomy 7 co-occurrence was first characterized by Makishima et al. 2
[2] H 2013
Somatic SETBP1 mutations in myeloid malignancies. Nat Genet (2013)
as a hallmark of aggressive myeloid transformation.

PyClone-VI 16
[16] S 2020
PyClone-VI: scalable inference of clonal population structures using whole genome data. BMC Bioinformatics (2020)
clonal reconstruction shows linear evolution: DNMT3A (CCF 1.00) → EZH2 (0.92) → SETBP1 (0.87) → PTPN11 (0.74) → IDH2 (0.05). The founding clone carries three epigenetic regulators (DNMT3A + EZH2 + IDH2's metabolic effect on TET2), creating what may be described as a triple epigenetic catastrophe. No existing treatment protocol addresses this combination.

Type 1 progression mutations 15
[15] H 2017
Dynamics of clonal evolution in myelodysplastic syndromes. Nat Genet (2017)
. The signaling pathway hits (PTPN11, IDH2) acquired during transformation define the clonal trajectory from MDS to AML.

And the patient is alive. MRD-negative. 28+ months post-HSCT. That is the other side of being outside the model.

OncoKB Actionability

VariantOncoKB LevelActionable DrugStatus
IDH2 R140QLevel 1EnasidenibFDA-approved 2017
PTPN11 E76QLevel 3BSHP2 inhibitors (TNO155; SHP2i+venetoclax synergy)Clinical trials
DNMT3A R882HOncogenicAzacitidine (indirect)Standard of care
SETBP1 G870SOncogenicNone (PP2A activators experimental)Preclinical
EZH2 V662ALikely OncogenicTazemetostat CONTRAINDICATED (LoF)N/A
Only 2 of 5 drivers have FDA-approved targeted therapy (IDH2: enasidenib 21
[21] EM 2017
Enasidenib in mutant IDH2 relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Blood (2017)
) or active clinical trials (PTPN11: SHP2 inhibitors 23
[23] MJ 2020
Identification of TNO155, an Allosteric SHP2 Inhibitor for the Treatment of Cancer. J Med Chem (2020)
). The remaining 3 have no direct inhibitors. SHP2 inhibitor + venetoclax synergy 22
[22] B 2023
Allosteric SHP2 inhibition increases apoptotic dependency on BCL2 and synergizes with venetoclax in AML. Cell Rep Med (2023)
is the most promising combination strategy. This is a targetability gap that underscores the complexity of this profile.
Source: OncoKB levels per Chakravarty et al. JCO 2017 35
[35] D 2017
OncoKB: A Precision Oncology Knowledge Base. JCO Precis Oncol (2017)
. EZH2 V662A classified as loss-of-function; tazemetostat is indicated for gain-of-function EZH2 mutations only.
References
  1. Bernard E, Tuechler H, Greenberg PL, et al. Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes. NEJM Evid (2022). DOI
  2. Döhner H, Wei AH, Appelbaum FR, et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 ELN recommendations. Blood (2022). PubMed
  3. Papaemmanuil E, Gerstung M, Bullinger L, et al. Genomic Classification and Prognosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. N Engl J Med (2016). PubMed
  4. Chase A, Score J, Lin F, et al. Mutational mechanisms of EZH2 inactivation in myeloid neoplasms. Leukemia (2020). PubMed
  5. Ball S, Aguirre LE, Jain AG, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of EZH2-mutant myelodysplastic syndrome. Leuk Res (2023). PubMed
  6. Makishima H, Yoshida K, Nguyen N, et al. Somatic SETBP1 mutations in myeloid malignancies. Nat Genet (2013). PubMed
  7. Gillis S, Roth A. PyClone-VI: scalable inference of clonal population structures using whole genome data. BMC Bioinformatics (2020). DOI
  8. Makishima H, Yoshizato T, Yoshida K, et al. Dynamics of clonal evolution in myelodysplastic syndromes. Nat Genet (2017). PubMed
  9. Stein EM, DiNardo CD, Pollyea DA, et al. Enasidenib in mutant IDH2 relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Blood (2017). PubMed
  10. LaMarche MJ, Acker M, Argintaru A, et al. Identification of TNO155, an Allosteric SHP2 Inhibitor for the Treatment of Cancer. J Med Chem (2020). PubMed
  11. Popescu B, Stahlhut C, Tarver TC, et al. Allosteric SHP2 inhibition increases apoptotic dependency on BCL2 and synergizes with venetoclax in AML. Cell Rep Med (2023). PubMed
  12. Chakravarty D, Gao J, Phillips SM, et al. OncoKB: A Precision Oncology Knowledge Base. JCO Precis Oncol (2017). PubMed